The Truth About Pepe Reina’s Errors

Following Pepe Reina’s part in Sergio Aguero’s equaliser for Manchester City in their 2-2 draw with Liverpool on Sunday, this tweet was in heavy circulation:

Reina‘s mistakes cost Liverpool 14 points this season. Without those faults, Liverpool would be in the 3rd place. (via Opta Stats)

Fourteen points sounds like a hell of a lot, so I thought I’d investigate. As with many ‘facts’ floating around on Twitter, it proved to be hugely far from the truth.

Pepe-reina-pictureUsing the data from EPLIndex, I was able to establish that errors by Reina have, at most, cost Liverpool a mere three points this season, and that is based on the assumption that the result would have remained as it was if the error had not happened, which is obviously impossible to prove.

For the record, his errors that have lead to goals have occurred in the following matches:

Arsenal at home (the Reds would’ve still lost 1-0)

Norwich City away (which Liverpool won anyway)

Tottenham Hotspur away (which, in theory would have been a 1-1 draw without the mistake, so one point lost)

Manchester City away (Two points lost on the assumption that the Reds would’ve have won 2-1 otherwise; they may not have).

As the error data is available back to 2008/09, I checked all of those seasons too, and found that at most, Pepe Reina has cost Liverpool six points in four-and-a-half seasons; barely more than a point a year, in other words.

This isn’t to say that I think Reina should be entirely exempt from criticism right now, as his form has been on the wane for some time, but he is definitely not as costly error-wise as the Twitterati may have you believe.

Related articles you may enjoy:

The Decline of Pepe Reina – The Spaniard’s save percentage has been on a downward slope since his first season…

Rodgers Requires Reina – Pepe’s passing stats show what he offers that Jones can not.

Please check out my other articles, and follow me on Twitter or via Facebook. Thanks.

11 thoughts on “The Truth About Pepe Reina’s Errors

  1. But how about his poor shot saved %? You could argue he should have saved Walcott’s goal last Wednesday! His time has been, he has to be replaced in the summer

  2. Yea about his save %, In his former years Liverpool played under Benitez, which liked to sit back more than our “latest” mangers does, thus, you force the opponent to take shots from further out, in theory. And in theory that should be a higher save %. Get my point?

      • Ye, taking shots from outside the area is easier than saving a clear cut or a one on one with the keeper and therefor he used to have a higher save %. In my opinion, Reina used to be the top 3 keepers in the world and I think we’ve been spoiled. Making some mistakes in the nearer past only proves he’s a human. And after all, he has commentating on his form saying that he’s had som up and downs lately. Its not like he’s escaping reality.

        Also Reina is a goolkeeper, and still he is the Liverpool no# 1 in fitness tests. If we are to sell Reina, which is a possibilty, which keeper, who we are able to get, would have a bigger winning head than Reina? You tell me

  3. Pingback: Shots On Target Difference | Bass Tuned To Red

  4. Pingback: Replacing Reina | Bass Tuned To Red

  5. Pingback: Is Mignolet The Man To Replace Reina? | Bass Tuned To Red

  6. Pingback: Jones and Reina Comparison | Bass Tuned To Red

  7. Pingback: The Pepe Penalty Myth | Bass Tuned To Red

  8. Pingback: 2013 Review (and a Thank You!) | Bass Tuned To Red

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s